He is an honors graduate of Lafayette College and received his JD degree from Columbia University Law School as a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. He has taught Trade Secret law at UC Berkeley and Santa Clara. In 2016 Jim was inducted into the IP Hall of Fame for his contributions to IP law and practice.
![james pooley oplc james pooley oplc](https://thesedonaconference.org/sites/default/files/Galli_Nicole.jpg)
He is Chair Emeritus of the Sedona Conference Working Group 12 on Trade Secrets and is Co-Chair of the ICC Trade Secrets Task Force. He currently works as an Owner/Broker at c ompanyName. James H A Pooley, James H Apooley and James H Pooley are some of the alias or nicknames that James has used. Previously cities included Palm Springs CA and Los Altos CA. He has served in the past as President of AIPLA and Chairman of the National Inventors Hall of Fame. James Pooley 's birthday is and is 73 years old. From 2009 to 2014 he managed the international patent system (PCT) at WIPO in Geneva as Deputy Director General for Innovation and Technology.
![james pooley oplc james pooley oplc](https://jamespooley.codes/img/bing_api.jpg)
The Senate Judiciary Committee relied on Jim for expert testimony and advice regarding the 2016 Defend Trade Secrets Act, and one Senator called his participation “instrumental” in achieving passage of this landmark legislation. His most recent business book is Secrets: Managing Information Assets in the Age of Cyberespionage (Verus Press 2015). He is an author or co-author of several major IP works, including his treatise Trade Secrets (Law Journal Press) and the Patent Case Management Judicial Guide (Federal Judicial Center). Clients’ desire for secrecy is also why we are seeing an increase in the number of private arbitrations, which can be kept out of the public eye, compared to litigation, which is in a public forum.James (Jim) Pooley focuses on trade secret law and data asset management, as an advocate, expert, advisor and neutral. I believe the passage of the DTSA will reinforce the inclination to keep some IP as a trade secret. We see more clients actively debating whether to try to protect their IP through patents, or whether they might better keep the information secret and protect it under trade secrets law. The value of intellectual property, however, continues to increase. These changes to patent law have made it more difficult to enforce patents. Further, the America Invents Act, which was signed into law September 2011, provides for tougher patent review proceedings. Akamai, increasing the volume of patent litigation. The Supreme Court has ruled on several patent-related matters, such as Alice Corp vs. Gerardi: We have seen a steady increase in trade secret litigation and even more arbitrations given the recent changes to US patent laws, and given that the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) was recently signed into law, there will surely be even more activity going forward. This is driven in part by the fact that arbitration proceedings are generally – but not always – confidential and the relative ease of enforcing any award. He has testified before Congress several times, and previously served as the Depute Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization. We have also seen indications that arbitration is becoming a more popular way of resolving commercial trade secrets disputes, especially where international parties and transactions are involved. Title: Home - James Pooley, Trade Secret Expert James Pooley, PLC Description: Jim Pooley is a consummate expert in trade secrets, working as an attorney, author, professor, advisor, and diplomat.
![james pooley oplc james pooley oplc](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qKyWUm_As98/maxresdefault.jpg)
Interestingly, the litigation has not been focused in one or two specific sectors.
![james pooley oplc james pooley oplc](https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/hermistonherald.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/c4/fc425a5a-0841-11e9-a1e2-d78732f7bf0c/5c2225179fc58.image.jpg)
The courts have regularly shown willingness – wherever possible – to protect businesses and to uphold reasonable restrictions contained within contracts of employment. From this activity it is possible to discern a trend of judicial sympathy towards employers. CD: Reflecting on the last 12-18 months, could you provide an overview of trade secret litigation activity? What overarching trends and developments have you witnessed?įroud: The number of cases involving employee competition, breaches of confidence and team moves has remained steady during this period.